Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Ghose, M. K.
- Estimation of Pyrogenic Carbon Emissions from Forests of Sikkim Himalaya, India:A Geoinformatics Approach
Abstract Views :244 |
PDF Views:91
Authors
Pradeep Kumar
1,
M. K. Ghose
2
Affiliations
1 Forests, Environment and Wildlife Management Department, Government of Sikkim, Deorali, Gangtok 737 102, IN
2 Sikkim Manipal University, Gangtok 737 102, IN
1 Forests, Environment and Wildlife Management Department, Government of Sikkim, Deorali, Gangtok 737 102, IN
2 Sikkim Manipal University, Gangtok 737 102, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 112, No 09 (2017), Pagination: 1864-1872Abstract
With a view to understanding the micro-level mechanisms and lay the future path for improved carbon emission estimations from forest fires, we estimate fire emissions in Sikkim Himalaya, India. Remote sensing and geographical information system were used for fire scar identification, by mapping the multiple strata-based carbon density and partitioning the forest carbon into multiple pools. Fraction of carbon consumed in fire was further partitioned into the processes of flaming and smouldering. The estimation of trace gases of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and methane was made accordingly.Keywords
Carbon Emissions, Forest Fire, Geoinformatics Approach, Remote Sensing.References
- FAO, Mountain forests in a changing world: realizing values, addressing challenges, International year of forests, 2011.
- Ward, D., In Forest Fires (ed. Miyanishi, E. A. J.), Academic Press, 2001, pp. 55–77.
- Palacios-Orueta, A., Chuvieco, E., Parra, A. and CarmonaMoreno, C., Biomass burning emissions: a review of models using remote-sensing data. Environ. Monit. Assess, 2005, 104, 189–209.
- Sanhueza, E., Crutzen, P. J. and Fernández, E., Production of boundary layer ozone from tropical American Savannah biomass burning emissions. Atmos. Environ., 1999, 33, 4969–4975.
- Kaufman, Y. J., Tucker, C. J. and Fung, I., Remote sensing of biomass burning in the tropics. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 1990, 95, 9927–9939.
- SFR, India State of Forest Report 2015, Forest Survey of India Dehradun, India, 2015.
- Byram, G. M., Combustion of forest fuels. For. Fire Control Use, 1959, 1, 155–182.
- Cofer, W. R., Koutzenogii, K. P., Kokorin, A. and Ezcurra, A., In Sediment Records of Biomass Burning and Global Change (eds Clark, J. S. et al.), Springer, Berlin, 1997, pp. 189–206.
- French, N. H. F., Kasischke, E. S. and Williams, D. G., Variability in the emission of carbon-based trace gases from wildfire in the Alaskan boreal forest. J. Geophys. Res., 2002, 108, 1–7.
- Kasischke, E. S. and Bruhwiler, L. P., Emissions of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and methane from boreal forest fires in 1998. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 1984–2012, 2002, 107, FFR–2.
- Kasischke, E. S. and Penner, J. E., Improving global estimates of atmospheric emissions from biomass burning. J. Geophys. Res., 2004, 109.
- Kasischke, E., Penner, J. and Justice, C., Joint GOFC/GOLD Fire and IGBP-IGAC/BIBEX Workshop on Improving Global Estimates of Atmospheric Emissions from Biomass Burning, Executive Summary, GOFC-GOLD, 2002.
- Watson, C., Forest Carbon Accounting: Overview and Principles, United Nations Development Programme, 2009.
- French, N. H. F. et al., In Fire, Climate Change, and Carbon Cycling in the Boreal Forest (eds Kasischke, E. S. and Stocks, B. J.), Springer, New York, 2000, vol. 138, pp. 377–388.
- Forest Survey of India, Carbon Stock in India’s Forests, 2013.
- IPCC, Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, 1996.
- Seiler, W. and Crutzen, P. J., Estimates of gross and net fluxes of carbon between the biosphere and the atmosphere from biomass burning. Clim. Change, 1980, 2, 207–247.
- French, N. H. F., Kasischke, E. S. and Williams, D. G., Variability in the emission of carbon-based trace gases from wildfire in the Alaskan boreal forest. J. Geophys. Res., 2002, 108.
- French, N. H. F., Kasischke, E. S. and Williams, D. G., Variability in the emission of carbon‐based trace gases from wildfire in the Alaskan boreal forest. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 2002, 107.
- Cahoon, D. R., Stocks, B. J., Levine, J. S., Cofer, W. R. and Pierson, J. M., Satellite analysis of the severe 1987 forest fires in northern China and southeastern Siberia. J. Geophys. Res., 1994, 99, 18627.
- González-Pérez, J. A., González-Vila, F. J., Almendros, G. and Knicker, H., The effect of fire on soil organic matter – a review. Environ. Int., 2004, 30, 855–870.
- Chandler, C. C., Williams, D., Trabaud, L. V., Thomas, P. and Cheney, P., Fire in Forestry. Vol. 1: Forest Fire Behaviour and Effects, John Wiley, New York, USA, 1983.
- Campbell, J., Donato, D., Azuma, D. and Law, B., Pyrogenic carbon emission from a large wildfire in Oregon, United States. J. Geophys. Res., 2007, 112.
- Houghton, J. T., Climate Change 1994: Radiative Forcing of Climate Change and an Evaluation of the IPCC 1992 IS92 Emission Scenarios, Cambridge University Press, 1995.
- French, N. H. F., Uncertainty in estimating carbon emissions from boreal forest fires. J. Geophys. Res., 2004, 109.
- Remote Sensing-Derived Spectral Vegetation Indices and Forest Carbon:Testing the Validity of Models in Mountainous Terrain Covered with High Biodiversity
Abstract Views :261 |
PDF Views:76
Authors
Pradeep Kumar
1,
M. K. Ghose
2
Affiliations
1 Forests, Environment and Wildlife Management Department, Government of Sikkim, Gangtok 737 102, IN
2 Sikkim Manipal University, Gangtok 737 102, IN
1 Forests, Environment and Wildlife Management Department, Government of Sikkim, Gangtok 737 102, IN
2 Sikkim Manipal University, Gangtok 737 102, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 112, No 10 (2017), Pagination: 2043-2050Abstract
Sequestration of carbon through forests is an important aspect in global climate change mitigation. Assessment of carbon in forests using remote sensing and GIS tools is one of the most important aspects of rapid and verifiable methodologies. A number of studies have shown the utility of spectral (vegetation) indices like NDVI in the assessment of forest carbon. However, there are limitations to this approach. The mountainous topography and high biodiversity affect the spectral values in pixels in multiple ways. The present article aims to test the validity of use of vegetation indices in high-biodiversity forests in mountains by modelling the ground based forest carbon measurement with vegetation indices of NDVI, EVI, SAVI and MSAVI in a multi-sensor, multi-season data environment with multiple regression methods like linear, power, logarithmic, polynomial and exponential. It is found that all the regressions have a poor coefficient of determination not even exceeding 0.2. It is concluded that the remote sensing-based spectral vegetation indices alone cannot be a proxy for forest carbon calculators in high biodiversity mountain forests.Keywords
Biodiversity, Forest Carbon, Mountain, Remote Sensing, Vegetation Indices.References
- McKinley, D. C. et al., A synthesis of current knowledge on forests and carbon storage in the United States. Ecol. Appl., 2011, 21, 1902–1924.
- FAO, Biomass, Assessment of the Status of the Development of the Standards for the Terrestrial Essential Climate Variables, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, 2006.
- Envis Centre, Sikkim; http://www.sikenvis.nic.in/Database/Biodiversity_776.aspx (accessed on 17 December 2015).
- SFR, India State of Forest Report 2015, Forest Survey of India Dehradun, India, 2015.
- Forest Survey of India, Carbon Stock in India’s Forests.
- Asrar, G., Fuchs, M., Kanemasu, E. T. and Hatfield, J. L., Estimating absorbed photosynthetic radiation and leaf area index from spectral reflectance in wheat. Agron. J., 1984, 76, 300–306.
- Baret, F. and Guyot, G., Potentials and limits of vegetation indices for LAI and APAR assessment. Remote Sensing Environ., 1991, 35, 161–173.
- Colwell, J. E., Vegetation canopy reflectance. Remote Sensing Environ., 1974, 3, 175–183.
- Huete, A., Justice, C. and Leeuwen, W. van., MODIS Vegetation Index (Mod 13) Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document, Univeristy of Arizona, University of Virginia, 1999.
- Masek, J. G. et al., A landsat surface reflectance dataset for North America, 1990– 2000. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sensing Lett., 2006, 3, 68–72.
- Solano, R., Didan, K., Jacobson, A. and Huete, A., MODIS vegetation index user’s guide (MOD13 series). Veg. Index Phenol. Lab., 2010.
- Huete, A. et al., Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing Environ., 2002, 83, 195–213.
- Lu, D., The potential and challenge of remote sensing‐based biomass estimation. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 2006, 27, 1297–1328.
- Lu, D. et al., A survey of remote sensing-based aboveground biomass estimation methods in forest ecosystems. Int. J. Digit. Earth, 9, 2016, 63–105.
- Goswami, S., Gamon, J., Vargas, S. and Tweedie, C., Relationships of NDVI, biomass, and leaf area index (LAI) for six key plant species in Barrow, Alaska, 2015; doi:10.7287/peerj.preprints.913v1.
- Zhu, X. and Liu, D., Improving forest aboveground biomass estimation using seasonal Landsat NDVI time-series. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sensing, 2015, 102, 222–231.
- Wulder, M. A., Hall, R. J., Coops, N. C. and Franklin, S. E., High spatial resolution remotely sensed data for ecosystem characterization. BioScience, 2004, 54, 511.
- Kerr, J. T. and Ostrovsky, M., From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing. Trends Ecol. Evol., 2003, 18, 299–305.
- Nagendra, H., Using remote sensing to assess biodiversity. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 2001, 22, 2377–2400.
- Benson, M., Pierce, L. and Sarabandi, K., Estimating boreal forest canopy height and above ground biomass using multi-modal remote sensing; a database driven approach. in 2498–2501, IEEE, 2016; doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2016.7729645.
- Wu, Z., Dye, D., Vogel, J. and Middleton, B., Estimating forest and woodland aboveground biomass using active and passive remote sensing. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 2016, 82, 271–281.
- Latifi, H. et al., Stratified aboveground forest biomass estimation by remote sensing data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinform., 2015, 38, 229–241.